How many sql cals do i need

Included with the ML are the rights to run the corresponding management server software, so you do not need to acquire separate licenses for the management server software.

Software licensed by ML. Cal and MLs. You can also find up-to-date licensing information for specific products at Product Licensing Search. Microsoft Core CAL Suite: Provides six innovative technologies from Microsoft that can be used to establish a solid IT infrastructure and delivers the essential capabilities that every user needs. Microsoft Enterprise CAL Suite: Delivers the future of productivity with 12 of the latest products in compliance, real-time collaboration, security, communication, desktop management, and more.

Client Access License Suite licensing rights. CAL Suites simplify licensing and tracking by reducing the number of licenses that are necessary to access Microsoft servers. CAL Suites may also provide pricing that is more attractive than licensing the equivalent components individually. The Microsoft CAL Suites include licenses across the Microsoft productivity and core infrastructure sets of technologies.

Microsoft CAL Suites provide software rights to a subset of the Microsoft portfolio of server-based products. To begin using these services, contact your Microsoft Partner, who can begin the provisioning process required to activate each service.

In all cases, under a CAL Suite, your use rights with respect to a particular product or online service are the same as if that component were licensed separately.

The only exception is that both per-user and per-device options are available in CAL Suites, even when both options are not available outside the suite. CAL Suites are offered only with Software Assurance coverage, and they therefore provide you with the right to use the most recent version of every product in the suite. If Software Assurance coverage lapses and you are vested with perpetual rights, use rights are determined by the latest version of the products that were in effect prior to the lapse in coverage.

Rights for the online services expire upon lapse of Software Assurance coverage, regardless of whether the CAL Suite is perpetual. CAL Suite Bridges. If you go with core-based licenses, then all your CAL problems go away. A million people could access that server and you would be all set … at least from a licensing standpoint.

The answer depends on the number of users or devices that need to access SQL. In this situation, it would cost about the same for you to buy core licenses as it would to buy a server license and 31 CALs:. So if you have over 31 users, then you should go with core licenses. See my post here for more details on how to weigh the options.

A CAL is required for each distinct device or user to the multiplexing or pooling software or hardware front end. This remains true no matter how many tiers of hardware or software exist between the server running SQL Server and the client devices that ultimately use its data, services, or functionality.

An exception to this includes the manual transfer of data from employee to employee. For example, if an employee sends a Microsoft Excel version of a report to another employee, the receiving employee does not require a CAL. An additional exception is communication exclusively between the servers running SQL Server.

Anyone using your Application has to be covered by a CAL, including someone who uses it solely to generate Excel Reports but someone who only receives a copy of one of those Excel Reports by e-mail doesn't.

If you want to get a full understanding of all of the alternatives the definitive document is Microsoft's 63 page SQL Server Licensing Guide which covers all licensing models and approaches. Helvick said it all, but I just wanted to add that for your scenario it might be best to go with a processor licensing model, so you would need to pay for each processor on the database server rather than for each client accessing the server.

Depending on how many cores your Server has and how much you expect traffic to rise the per processor route could be cheaper. In the whitepapers for SQL , they actually make it a selling point, saying that Oracle and others often charge per-core.

On top of that note that there is different licensing available for internet facing systems - so you dont have to limit the users. The limits are very ok for most scenarios Sign up to join this community.

The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog.